Difference between revisions of "Application talk:MetaDoctor"
(→Ubuntu: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
To clarify one thing, one my Kubuntu (ubuntu with KDE front-end) java wouldn't start with a <code>Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable.</code> but it has worked fine (albeit with different issues!) on my ubuntu (with Gnome) netbook. --[[User:AlisonW|AlisonW]] 17:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC) | To clarify one thing, one my Kubuntu (ubuntu with KDE front-end) java wouldn't start with a <code>Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable.</code> but it has worked fine (albeit with different issues!) on my ubuntu (with Gnome) netbook. --[[User:AlisonW|AlisonW]] 17:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Miscellaneous== | ||
| + | |||
| + | It seems to me, that clarification for linux beginner and the following "how to enablge WiFi Profiles" Section are dealing with exactly the same issure. Can't the clarification part be deleted? | ||
| + | --[http://www.twitter.com/DiplPhy @DiplPhy] 13:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:40, 23 November 2011
How to change a provider's DB-entry so 3G data can be used on the Pre
This is a bit off-topic, and should be either removed completely or replaced by a link to How to solve 3G data problems, IMHO. --Mephinet 12:07, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Ubuntu
To clarify one thing, one my Kubuntu (ubuntu with KDE front-end) java wouldn't start with a Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable. but it has worked fine (albeit with different issues!) on my ubuntu (with Gnome) netbook. --AlisonW 17:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Miscellaneous
It seems to me, that clarification for linux beginner and the following "how to enablge WiFi Profiles" Section are dealing with exactly the same issure. Can't the clarification part be deleted? --@DiplPhy 13:40, 23 November 2011 (UTC)