Difference between revisions of "User talk:X1011"
Templarian (talk | contribs) (moved discussion to the common.css talk page) |
(revert (you deleted a section)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == moving pages == | ||
| + | {{Warn|reason=You did a good job moving those other pages around, but please make sure to fix all linking pages after you move it, and file the old page under [[Admin Changes]]. Another note don't move pages out of the help section. --[[user:Templarian|Templarian]]}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wikipedia puts their policies in the Wikipedia: namespace. This separates technical help pages (how do i do this?) from policy pages (what is the established standard for this?). I think we should follow a similar model. If you disagree, start a discussion section in [[WebOS Internals talk:Policies and guidelines]], move these comments there, and then state your reasons clearly. —[[user:X1011|X1011]] 03:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
== noob page == | == noob page == | ||
re your NOOB page. Great job. I think it needs to be prominently linked off the front page, requiring a change to the front page template. [[User:Rboatright|rboatright]] | re your NOOB page. Great job. I think it needs to be prominently linked off the front page, requiring a change to the front page template. [[User:Rboatright|rboatright]] | ||
Latest revision as of 04:20, 6 August 2009
moving pages
Wikipedia puts their policies in the Wikipedia: namespace. This separates technical help pages (how do i do this?) from policy pages (what is the established standard for this?). I think we should follow a similar model. If you disagree, start a discussion section in WebOS Internals talk:Policies and guidelines, move these comments there, and then state your reasons clearly. —X1011 03:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
noob page
re your NOOB page. Great job. I think it needs to be prominently linked off the front page, requiring a change to the front page template. rboatright
talking about NOOB Friendly Getting Started aka Portal: Where to Get Started? that's not mine; that was the work of Imop45 —X1011 04:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
magic wand
Magic wand should be coming up. Con census was yes. That said, before making BIG changes to the layout of the wiki, please, lets try to have a consensus of the editors. rboatright
cool, will do, but keep in mind that granting adminship should not be a big deal —X1011 04:37, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- when I first started editing wikipedia in 2003, when it had less than 5K articles, adminship was a big deal. Jimbo didn't like that, and it wasn't long later that he made his famous "will-nilly" comment. but the simple reality is that who you choose to be part of the editorial team early on shapes the eventual outcome of the community's identity.
- Never-the-less, happy to welcome you aboard. rboatright 13:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
the 'editorial team' is everyone who chooses to edit the wiki. restricting adminship only makes it harder for people who want to contribute deeply. —X1011 06:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
still waiting on that magic wand... —X1011 02:31, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Editor List Been busy, but whitby should be getting this sorted out shortly (still has to add "editors" to the list for the protect page) --Templarian 02:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
contact
I added you to the Contact page. -hopspitfire 05:58, 3 August 2009 (UTC)